Skip to Main Content
Skip to main content

Understanding Generative AI (GenAI) Tutorial

This module replaces the GenAI module found in the 2018 Academic Integrity Tutorial. The 2024 Academic Integrity Tutorial does not contain a module about GenAI specifically. Please use this one instead.

Complete the Poll

Complete the poll below to determine what you may already know about generative artificial intelligence (GenAI).

Clicking will compare your response to others, but does not determine a right or wrong answer. The poll is merely a way to establish some common perceptions about the use of generative AI. To learn more, click the Don't Know link.

Agree/Disagree

Generative AI, if used appropriately, can be a valuable tool for assisting students in academic writing and content creation.
Agree: 1540 votes (68.78%)
Disagree: 576 votes (25.73%)
Don't Know: 123 votes (5.49%)
Total Votes: 2239
The use of generative AI in university learning raises ethical concerns about plagiarism and academic honesty.
Agree: 2097 votes (96.68%)
Disagree: 45 votes (2.07%)
Don't know: 27 votes (1.24%)
Total Votes: 2169
Generative AI can perpetuate the biases present in its training data, reinforcing stereotypes and prejudices.
Agree: 1938 votes (90.01%)
Disagree: 93 votes (4.32%)
Don't know: 122 votes (5.67%)
Total Votes: 2153
Students are responsible for learning about the ethical and responsible use of generative AI tools in their academic pursuits.
Agree: 2059 votes (96.94%)
Disagree: 30 votes (1.41%)
Don't know: 35 votes (1.65%)
Total Votes: 2124
Students can harness the power of generative AI while maintaining academic integrity, nurturing their creativity and critical thinking skills.
Agree: 1781 votes (84.17%)
Disagree: 227 votes (10.73%)
Don't know: 108 votes (5.1%)
Total Votes: 2116
The university has clear guidelines and policies around the use of generative AI tools in academic settings.
Agree: 1709 votes (81.85%)
Disagree: 162 votes (7.76%)
Don't know: 217 votes (10.39%)
Total Votes: 2088
By relying too heavily on generative AI tools, students jeopardize the intellectual growth that comes from crafting original ideas and developing critical analysis skills.
Agree: 1963 votes (96.94%)
Disagree: 40 votes (1.98%)
Don't know: 22 votes (1.09%)
Total Votes: 2025
Students should always cite generative AI tools when incorporating its content into their academic work.
Agree: 1743 votes (86.03%)
Disagree: 109 votes (5.38%)
Don't know: 174 votes (8.59%)
Total Votes: 2026
ChatGPT and other large language models make things up, so it is essential to critically assess the accuracy and credibility of AI-generated content.
Agree: 1820 votes (90.64%)
Disagree: 84 votes (4.18%)
Don't know: 104 votes (5.18%)
Total Votes: 2008
Students can freely share sensitive or personal data with AI tools, as complete anonymity and security is guaranteed.
Agree: 336 votes (16.17%)
Disagree: 1673 votes (80.51%)
Don't care: 69 votes (3.32%)
Total Votes: 2078
Students should respect intellectual property rights and seek proper permissions when using AI tools that involve copyrighted material.
Agree: 2003 votes (96.16%)
Disagree: 35 votes (1.68%)
Don't know: 45 votes (2.16%)
Total Votes: 2083

The University of Saskatchewan's main campus is situated on Treaty 6 Territory and the Homeland of the Métis.

© University of Saskatchewan
Disclaimer|Privacy