Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
Skip to main content

Synthesis Review Toolkit Introduction: Tips for a Successful Synthesis Review

Success Factors for First-time Reviewers

Starting your first synthesis review may be daunting as a first-time reviewer. For instance, the extensive time commitment involved, working with a research team, or systematically using syntax in search databases may be a great departure from your previous studies.

To provide assistance to individuals embarking upon their first synthesis review, we have gathered key tips and advice for first-time reviewers from both the student's and librarian's perspective.

Tips from the Student's Perspective

Tips from the Librarian's Perspective

As part of SCPOR's webinar series Raising the Evidence Bar: Scientific Literature and Literature Synthesis series, Dr. Margaret Sampson, a medical librarian at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), presented a webinar titled "Literature Searches: Success Factors for First-time Reviewers." The following are key tips and advice that Dr. Sampson suggests to improve your review's search strategy:

  • When finding relevant reviews, you may be able to update or replace a review if it is not recent or if it was not conducted adequately
  • Narrow your question so that your results are not overly broad (extensive/impossible amount of search results to screen)
  • ​​ When conducting literature search of relevant reviews (stage 1: getting started), ask for help from your librarian to determine the size of the literature
  • If conducting a Systematic review, know that it is time sensitive. Dr Sampson suggests to submit to a journal that is likely to accept and publish the article efficiently

Advice & Other Comments

  • Understand that evidence synthesis projects are a lot of work
    • A Cochrane Review may take 2 years simply to develop the protocol
    • Standards of conduct continue to increase
    • The easiest topics have already been completed
  • In Dr. Sampson's experience, more than 1000 records to screen (stage 3: screening) results in more than 6 months of screening. Further, more than 6 months of screening leads to low completion/publication rates
  • When working on your review, keep checking to see if anyone has published a review on your same topic. If so, you will need to adjust your review

For access to the full webinar and presentation slides, click here.