A nice, clear definition of the term "evidence based practice" based on Dr. David Sackett's pioneering work in the field.
Evidence-based practice is the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. That is, it integrates the best external evidence with individual clinical expertise and patients' choice.
Evidence-based practice involves 5 steps:
1. Ask a focused question to satisfy the health needs of a specific patient
- What is your clinical question? - use the P.I.C.O. model below.
- What type of clinical question is this? Therapy? Diagnosis? Use the table below.
- What is the best study design to answer this type of clinical question? Use the table below.
2. Find the best evidence by searching the literature
- What is the highest level of literature to support the question? See the pyramid below.
- Where should you look for this material? See the table below.
3. Critically appraise the literature: testing for validity, clinical relevance, and applicability
- What are the results of the study?
4. Apply the results in clinical practice
5. Evaluate the outcomes in your patient
Adapted from: the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and Sackett DL, Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71-2.
Access is restricted to current students, faculty, and staff of the University of Saskatchewan, and walk-in users, for educational, research, and non-commercial personal use. Systematic copying or downloading of electronic resource content is not permitted by Canadian and international copyright law.
Access is restricted to current students, faculty, and staff of the University of Saskatchewan, and walk-in users, for educational, research, and non-commercial personal use. Systematic copying or downloading of electronic resource content is not permitted by Canadian and international copyright law.
A collection of databases that contain high-quality, independent evidence to inform healthcare decision-making. Cochrane reviews represent the highest level of evidence on which to base clinical treatment decisions.
Access is restricted to current students, faculty, and staff of the University of Saskatchewan, and walk-in users, for educational, research, and non-commercial personal use. Systematic copying or downloading of electronic resource content is not permitted by Canadian and international copyright law.
This is an Open Access resource freely available on the Internet. Systematic copying or downloading of electronic resource content is not permitted by Canadian and international copyright law.To access full text, you must authenticate with your NSID.
Breaking up your question into these 4 elements (which you can easily remember with the mnmeonic device PICO) will make your literature search process easier:
Comparison intervention
Outcome
Sources of research may be either pre-appraised (summaries), primary literature or more anecdotal.
Systematic Reviews or Meta-analysis |
MEDLINE, Cochrane Library |
Critically-Appraised Topics | DynaMed |
Critically-Appraised Articles | ACP Journal Club |
Randomized Controlled Trials | Original articles (search MEDLINE) |
Cohort Studies | Original articles (search MEDLINE) |
Case-Controlled Studies etc. | Original articles (search MEDLINE) |
Background Info/Expert Opinion | Books, editorials |
The University of Saskatchewan's main campus is situated on Treaty 6 Territory and the Homeland of the Métis.
© University of Saskatchewan
Disclaimer|Privacy