The WildPro electronic library consists of books, scientific papers and documents that have been made available free of charge with the kind permission of the originators of these publications, with whom full copyright and responsibility rests.
NOTE: The Wildpro project cannot guarantee the accuracy of the data and accepts no responsibility for the application of the information contained within.
This site has been developed for veterinary graduates, students and nurses. It provides a comprehensive virtual curriculum containing a wealth of veterinary information and learning resources. Use the navigation buttons above to jump to the relevant section of the site or search for a particular topic.
From the University of Illinois, this guide focuses on abbreviations and acronyms commonly used in veterinary practice.It is intended for use by veterinary students, researchers, practitioners, and librarians.
Compiled by Cornell University, College of Veterinary Medicine Library, this page lists free electronic resources intended for veterinarians.
Here are some questions to guide you through the process of critical evaluation of information sources:
Relevance: - Is the document related to your topic? - Is the information at an appropriate depth or level for your assignment?
Authority: - Is the source a scholarly or popular publication? And is the publisher reputable in this discipline? - Is the author a recognized authority in this field of study? What are his or her credentials? (And are these credentials related to the subject matter?) - Do other authors quote from this author's works? - Is there a means of contacting the author?
Timeliness/Currency: - When was the document written? (Look for a publication, copyright, or “last updated” date.) - Is it recent enough to be relevant to your topic or discipline? Sometimes you are required to use recently published material; sometimes you must use historical documents.
Validity/Accuracy: - Does the author provide sources for statistical information? - Is the data from a valid study (that utilized accepted methodologies for the discipline)?
Argument: - Analyze the author's argument, the assumptions made, the evidence or data gathered, and the interpretation of the data. - Are there any flaws in the author's logic? - Does the author consider alternate interpretations of the evidence? - If you discovered that the author ignored other interpretations, is the author attempting to deceive or manipulate readers?
Coverage: - Does the author refer to relevant information or data that was available at the time the work was published? - Or, does the author use out-of-date information; or ignore information or data that was available at the time? - Did the author consider all aspects relevant to the topic?
Bias/Objectivity: - Does the author state any bias? - If you discovered any omissions in the coverage of the topic, did this reveal a bias or prejudice? - Is the author selling something? Do they have a corporate sponsor?