Skip to Main Content
Skip to main content

Critical Thinking Tutorial: Argument Analysis

This tutorial will empower you with valuable critical thinking skills that are essential for your university education.

Good Arguments vs Poor Arguments

Distinguishing good arguments from bad ones can be challenging because arguments are not always neatly packaged in ways that are easy to understand. Analyzing an argument involves

  • identifying the premises and the conclusion,
  • thinking objectively about the evidence, and
  • determining if the conclusion logically follows from the evidence provided.

A good argument is based on sound reasoning; it contains evidence that is relevant, reliable, and sufficient to support the conclusion. It also addresses possible counterarguments and does not contain any logical fallacies (fallacies are covered in the next module). In contrast, a bad argument may rely on faulty reasoning, use unreliable or irrelevant evidence, and/or contain logical fallacies. It may also fail to address counterarguments.

This video demonstrates how sound reasoning works when analyzing an argument. It is interactive, so respond to the questions to check your understanding.

You cannot skip ahead, but you can watch at 1.5 times the speed  and rewind in ten-second intervals , if needed.

Source: How to Argue - Philosophical Reasoning: Crash Course Philosophy by Hank Green on YouTube

Argument Terminology - Drag and Drop Activity